[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: Re: Crashing Windows 2000 on demand
Regarding Windows 2000....
In article <[email protected]>,
Thingfishhhh <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> nospam@nospam!.kom (Steve Nospam) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:54:11 -0500, Eric Bennett <[email protected]>
> > wrotf:
> >
> > >In article <[email protected]>,
> > >nospam@nospam!.kom (Steve Nospam) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> Based in this limited information it does sound like there are bugs.
> > >
> > >
> > >You hadn't already figured this out from Microsoft's admission of
> > >68,000
> > >"defects"???
> >
> > This has already been discussed extensively. There is zero evidence,
> > so far, that any of these defects influence any real-world use of the
> > OS. I fully expect to see some bugs that do affect users come to
> > light over the next few months, but I am not convinced that the two
> > Mac advocates that posted these bugs are using systems with good (as
> > in not broken) hardware. Given the limited information, it's
> > completely possible that this was caused by a bad DIMM, or a bad
> > cluster on the HD, etc.). Of course, as I already said, it's also
> > possible that it reflects a bug.
>
> Why do I think of General Custer saying "There arent that many Indians
> out there!" when I read this? :)
>
> --
> "go sell your salted fish." Ho Yo Kong, Feb 16, 2000
--
Eric Bennett ( http://www.pobox.com/~ericb/ )
Cornell University / Chemistry & Chemical Biology
===
This message was sent to mph-humor. No guarantees of actual humor are
provided. Archives and instructions are available from
<http://www.pobox.com/~mph/humor/>.